I have always assumed that the proliferation of information and communication
technologies (ICTs) would result into drastic improvements in service delivery.
However, trends among service oriented firms both in the private and public
sector, are worrying.
The
growing queues in banks despite reports of increased ATM coverage across the
country, inaccessible customer care or call centre service numbers by telecom
companies, ministries, and institutional websites that are not regularly
updated with client focused information, among others, necessitate an
examination of the quality of customer care amidst advances in ICT.
Reflecting
on my experience as a graduate trainee at the British Council Information
Centre, I cannot desist from asking “What happened to customer care?”
At the British Council, we were cognisant of the fact that excellent customer care service is all about bringing customers back and sending them away happy - happy enough to pass positive feedback about our services. Analysing clients’ feedback constituted part of our breakfast menu and was a key component of our continuous improvement strategy. Not only did we emphasise cultivating an empowered client base that knew their rights and obligations, but we also strived to maintain our shared values and high service standards.
At the British Council, we were cognisant of the fact that excellent customer care service is all about bringing customers back and sending them away happy - happy enough to pass positive feedback about our services. Analysing clients’ feedback constituted part of our breakfast menu and was a key component of our continuous improvement strategy. Not only did we emphasise cultivating an empowered client base that knew their rights and obligations, but we also strived to maintain our shared values and high service standards.
The
website was always updated; phone calls and e-mails were promptly responded to.
It was a ‘flat organisation’, in which anyone could attend to a telephone call
(within three rings), or a physical inquiry and referred the client to the best
placed person to handle the matter in case one was not in position to do so.
Through regular stakeholder engagements such as breakfast meetings, management
forum gatherings, and professional development courses and trainings, among
others, we tapped into stakeholder concerns and identified creative avenues for
improving our service delivery.
Thus,
through shared values and standards, we shaped our attitudes and leveraged
technology to deliver quality services to our clients. Experiences like calling
222 that is never accessible, waiting for six months to receive an ATM card
without progress updates, standing in a queue at the bank where the average
time for a single transaction is between 15 and 30 minutes, searching in vain a
ministry/agency website for the latest statistics on people accessing ARVs in
Uganda, make me wonder whether such institutions value their clients at all.
Do
these organisations have any service delivery standards or do they just take
their clients for granted? Why do telecoms and banks with such reputations of
poor service delivery continue to promote and advertise their products and
services yet they cannot satisfy their current clientele? Do they still attach
value to the notion of customer care?
As
Uganda prepares to celebrate 50 years of independence, it is important that
firms and institutions prioritise customer care and reflect on the quality of
their services. Instead of exploiting consumer ignorance, they should consider
the benefits of having an informed and empowered clientele. Consumer protection
agencies in conjunction with service oriented firms should sensitise the public
about their rights and obligations.
No comments:
Post a Comment